California Private Investigator Practice Exam

What should an investigator do if they find discrepancies in a suspect’s history?

1. Ignore the discrepancies

2. Document the discrepancies and investigate further

3. Report to the police

4. Confront the suspect immediately

The correct answer is: Document the discrepancies and investigate further

When an investigator discovers discrepancies in a suspect's history, the best course of action is to document those discrepancies and investigate further. This approach is crucial because it ensures that any inconsistencies are officially recorded, which can serve as valuable evidence in understanding the suspect's background and motives. By meticulously documenting the discrepancies, the investigator creates a reliable reference point for analysis and subsequent actions. This documentation can help establish patterns, identify potential deceit, or reveal connections that may not have been immediately apparent. It also provides a foundation for any future discussions or interviews, allowing the investigator to approach the situation knowledgeably. Investigating further after noting discrepancies is essential for ensuring that all relevant facts are gathered and understood. This step might involve exploring other sources of information, interviewing additional witnesses, or consulting expert opinions. Engaging in a thorough investigation will lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the suspect’s actions and intentions, ultimately enhancing the quality and credibility of the investigator's findings. In contrast, ignoring discrepancies could result in missing critical information that might affect the outcome of the case. Reporting to the police may be necessary at some point, but premature reporting without a complete understanding of the situation could lead to misunderstandings. Similarly, confronting the suspect without a well-prepared strategy can cause