California Private Investigator Practice Exam

In general, should you pursue a suspect on foot?

1. Yes, always

2. No, let them get away

3. Only if you are alone

4. Only if backup is unavailable

The correct answer is: No, let them get away

In the context of pursuing a suspect on foot, the best approach emphasizes the safety and tactical considerations of the situation. Allowing a suspect to get away might not seem ideal, but there are significant reasons that can justify this approach. First and foremost, pursuing a suspect can pose serious risks not only to the pursuer but also to the general public. If the suspect is potentially armed or dangerous, engaging in a foot chase can escalate the situation, leading to injury or harm. Additionally, this decision should account for factors such as the environment, the suspect's physical condition, and the potential for backup, all of which could affect the outcome of the pursuit. In most cases, law enforcement and private investigators prioritize gathering information and operating within a strategy rather than enforcing immediate action that might lead to confrontation. Factors such as assessing the likelihood of apprehension, evaluating the risk of public safety, and ensuring that proper protocols are followed, especially in situations with potential hazards, are critical. Hence, letting the suspect escape under certain circumstances—especially when additional resources are needed—is a more prudent tactical decision than pursuing them without adequate support.